How to Guy Who Literally Coined ‘Net Neutrality’ Now Works

By | April 1, 2021

During the rule of Telecom, the rules of the Internet have been seen to be flying, at least it is expected to come. The New York Times reports that Joe Biden has elected Tim Wu, who is credited with defining fundamental concepts such as Net Neutrality, in a new role as a special assistant for technology and competition policy in the National Economic Council. Let’s serve. While Wu’s power in the role of an advisor is still somewhat undefined, it represents a considerable step away from the corporate side-business that defines the Trump era.

As stated by the Protocol, policy-regulators regulate Wu’s writing and egalitarian rights on the opposition. His 2003 paper is believed to have coined the term “network neutrality”, which catalyzes the highly popular and hard-to-find Net Neutrality rules, which prevent Internet service providers from intentionally slowing, damaging sites and services. Are those who cannot pay big people. For bandwidth. Ajit Pai, president of Trump’s FCC / representative of the telecommunications government, repealed net neutrality in 2017, despite the possibility of the largest online protest.

Working together, Internet service providers can destroy Netflix by slowing their data to a crawl, making it impossible to watch movies.

Such apparent resentment is unlikely; Firms will certainly promise to behave themselves. But, instead, they can gradually begin to quietly withdraw money and threats from expensive carrots outside the Internet economy, taking out fees and tolls wherever they go. “You better pay for ‘Turbo’ access, Mr. Blogger, otherwise who knows how long it will take readers to access your content.” Or, for a new video-streaming service, it might say, “We’re going to put Hulu in front of you until you pay” – assuming that its customers are compared to the content of the new guy, Hulu Video It will be an easy time to watch. At T., Verizon and Comcast already collect more than three hundred billion dollars of revenue each year. But, like any good corporate citizen, they are more likeable.

Wu translated the words into action in 2015 as a senior enforcement attorney under New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, with an investigation by Verizon, Time Warner Cable and Cablevision that consumers were allegedly slow to pay Was promised It reached a $ 174.2 million agreement with Charter Communications (which bought Time Warner).

Under Obama, Wu served as an FTC adviser and helped formulate anti-design policy at the National Economic Council some time ago. But he had some regrets. In a conversation with WIRED on Antitrust, he said that he is not too hard on Mark Zuckerberg:

I don’t think anyone in the Obama administration was taking money, but we had such juicy scenes. When Mark Zuckerberg came to the Federal Trade Commission saying, “Oh, I’m so sorry about these privacy violations, but like, I’m a young man; I did not know what I was doing. We will never do it again, “everyone believed it and dropped the personal charges against him. But in reality, we were fools.

From then on, those excuses seemed less receptive. Last year, he praised the FTC and 40 state lawsuits against Facebook, accusing the company of illegally being out of competition. In particular, Wu stated that Zuckerberg had adopted a strategy to kill or win “Smirking and Aggregate Extreme”. She made a similar case for breaking Google, alleging that she “shamelessly cut” her users’ personal activity.

He also believed that politicians involved in the bipartisan crusade to kill Section 230 (Biden included) do not understand how Section 230 works and why killing it would harm younger players. “Suppressing 230 will be a pain, through private litigation, not only on big technology, but across the tech sector,” he wrote last year via Medium.

Wu has endorsed a TickTalk ban not as a trade watch chip but as a stance for uncensored surveillance-free internet.

And some of the cherry-picking fun proposals Wu has pitched over the years: Facebook pays us for its data, eliminates external tasks so everyone can do less work, and perhaps even a universal basic income. For a better understanding of his ideas, in general, consider The Curse of Beignes and The Attention Merchants (as if considering buying them from anywhere other than Amazon, such as another tech giant, in which Wu has been highly important). Distract from some of his books.

While there is more than enough imbalance and misconduct in the tech sector alone, the Times reports that Wu is also expected to weigh in on other industries such as big pharma and agriculture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.